From Notebook to Product: Shipping Machine Learning
The unglamorous work of taking ML models from Jupyter to production
From Notebook to Product: Shipping Machine Learning
The gap between a working Jupyter notebook and a production ML system is vast. I've seen brilliant models fail in production and mediocre models succeed. The difference? Engineering discipline.
The Notebook Trap
Notebooks are great for exploration, terrible for production. They encourage:
The first step to production is getting out of the notebook.
Data Contracts: The Foundation
Before writing any model code, establish data contracts:
Use tools like Great Expectations or Pandera. Fail fast when data doesn't match expectations.
Model Development Pipeline
Structure your code like software:
Use MLflow or Weights & Biases to track everything.
The Evaluation Problem
Accuracy isn't enough. Ask:
Build evaluation suites that test these scenarios.
Deployment Strategies
Start simple:
Monitor everything: latency, throughput, error rates, data drift, model performance.
Feedback Loops
The model you deploy is just the beginning. Build systems to:
The Unglamorous Truth
90% of ML engineering is data pipelines, monitoring, and infrastructure. 10% is the actual model. Embrace this reality. The teams that succeed are those that treat ML as software engineering with a statistical component, not magic.
Ship early, measure everything, iterate constantly. That's how you go from notebook to product.
Yash Sarang
AI Engineer, Developer, and Writer. Passionate about building intelligent systems and sharing knowledge through clear, actionable content.